STATE OF NATURE, SOCIAL CONTRACT, AND ELOQUENCE IN THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF THOMAS HOBBES

This bibliographical and theoretical study has the primary objective of analyzing the relationship between the ideas conceived and named by Thomas Hobbes as a state of nature, Social contract and eloquence, of the latter, analyzing its rhetorical ability. The first idea denotes a state prior to the...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Principais autores: Braga, Lélio, Alvez, Maria Gilvania da Silva, Braga, Aline Nascimento, Silva, Shirsley Joany dos Santos da, Júnior, Carlos Alberto Brito da Silva, Braga, Alessandra Nascimento
Formato: Online
Idioma:por
Publicado em: Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN
Endereço do item:https://periodicos.ufrn.br/saberes/article/view/33580
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
Descrição
Resumo:This bibliographical and theoretical study has the primary objective of analyzing the relationship between the ideas conceived and named by Thomas Hobbes as a state of nature, Social contract and eloquence, of the latter, analyzing its rhetorical ability. The first idea denotes a state prior to the constitution of civil society. It would be a hypothesis in which there would be war and competition between subjects, justified by the absence of a being that personifies sovereign power. In this context, each person pursues their personal interests, resulting in an insecure and unstable life. To escape this chaotic state, Hobbes proposes a contract, in which individuals agree to give up freedom and self-regulation in favor of the protection of an absolute sovereign that governs them. In support of the aforementioned social agreement, there is the talent of the rhetorical skill of eloquence, which would enter as an auxiliary of reason, shaping the passions of the subjects in favor of civil obedience. In conclusion, it is perceived that the Hobbesian contract constitutes the authority of the sovereign, but it is not enough in terms of preventing the return to the belligerent state without using the rhetorical skill of eloquence in the minds of the population as a reinforcement of civil obedience.