Who doesn't cheat doesn't leave school? Bricolage of high school students
The article has as object of study the subjective question, the relationship between the students' knowledge and the bricolages they sustain in the high school classes of a state school in the city of Cumbe, state of Sergipe. We have, as a starting point, two questions: what is the relationship...
Na minha lista:
| Principais autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Idioma: | por |
| Publicado em: |
Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN
|
| Endereço do item: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/educacaoemquestao/article/view/32756 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: | The article has as object of study the subjective question, the relationship between the students' knowledge and the bricolages they sustain in the high school classes of a state school in the city of Cumbe, state of Sergipe. We have, as a starting point, two questions: what is the relationship between students' knowledge and bricolage? What is the meaning of cheating on a test for students? We used elements of Bernard Charlot's knowledge, mainly, desire, subjective position, figures of learning and epistemic relationship with knowledge; and the notion of bricolage from Michel de Certeau. It is concluded that cheating is an alternative for the student not to fail in a particular subject with which he/she has no affinity or finds difficult to study and learn. It is a motivational device, with immediacy and mobilization character, because it finds meaning in overcoming the symbolic logics of the school in the face of a written test. In addition, it is a device of relationship with knowledge that confronts the norms and symbolic logics of the school and of specific subjects. |
|---|