The need and paradoxes of integral linguistics
Coseriu’s idea of an “integral linguistics” needs a thorough reflection because it embraces two different and partly incompatible aims: to counteract the extreme fragmentation of modern linguistic research through philosophical reflection on the true nature of “language”, and to work out some cohere...
Salvato in:
Autori principali: | , , |
---|---|
Natura: | Online |
Lingua: | por |
Pubblicazione: |
UFRN
|
Accesso online: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/30550 |
Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne! !
|
id |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article-30550 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article-305502023-06-23T16:59:32Z The need and paradoxes of integral linguistics A necessidade e os paradoxos da linguística integral Agud (Autora), Ana Pinheiro (Tradutor), Clemilton Lopes Parducci Soares de Lima (Tradutor), Mateus Desintegração Historicidade Individualidade Integração Objetos da Linguística Problemas da Linguística Integration vs. Disintegration linguistic criticism individuality and historicity individual constitution of linguistic problems and objects Coseriu’s idea of an “integral linguistics” needs a thorough reflection because it embraces two different and partly incompatible aims: to counteract the extreme fragmentation of modern linguistic research through philosophical reflection on the true nature of “language”, and to work out some coherent way of approaching linguistic research which avoids its being torn apart by the diversity of the objects constituted by linguists and linguistic schools. No new positive theory of the whole of language might overcome this disintegration. Coseriu‘s efforts to enlarge the scope to include linguistic facts have to be submitted to a radical skeptical reflection on the possibility of such an overall positive theory, based on the real fact that factual speech is not the mere use of any virtual system, but an ongoing creation of sense by individuals, and also that linguistics is itself such “factual speech”: individual, historical, diffuse. Coseriu did not deliver any general theory of language, but the living example of a rich and widely comprehensive individual personality, approaching language from a critical attitude to inherited categories and methods. A ideia de uma “linguística integral” de Coseriu precisa de uma reflexão profunda, pois engloba dois objetivos diferentes e parcialmente incompatíveis: neutralizar a extrema fragmentação da pesquisa linguística moderna através da reflexão filosófica sobre a verdadeira natureza da “linguagem”, e propor uma maneira coerente de abordar a pesquisa linguística sem a fragmentação causada pela diversidade dos objetos constituídos pelos linguistas e pelas escolas linguísticas. Nenhuma nova teoria positiva do conjunto da linguagem poderia superar esta desintegração. Os esforços de Coseriu para ampliar o escopo para incluir os fatos linguísticos devem ser submetidos a uma radical reflexão cética sobre a possibilidade desta teoria positiva geral, baseada no fato de que o “falar concreto” não é o mero uso de um sistema virtual, mas uma criação contínua de sentido por indivíduos, e no fato de que a linguística em si é este “falar concreto”: individual, histórica, difusa. Coseriu não apresentou nenhuma teoria geral da linguagem, mas foi o exemplo vivo de uma personalidade individual rica e abrangente, que abordou a linguagem a partir de uma atitude crítica em relação às categorias e aos métodos herdados. UFRN 2023-06-22 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/30550 Odisseia; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Revista Odisseia; 1-22 Revue Odisseia; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Revista Odisseia; 1-22 Revista Odisseia; v. 8 n. 1 (2023): Revista Odisseia; 1-22 1983-2435 10.21680/1983-2435.2023v8n1 por https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/30550/17099 Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Odisseia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
institution |
Periódicos UFRN |
collection |
Portal de Pediódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN |
language |
por |
format |
Online |
author |
Agud (Autora), Ana Pinheiro (Tradutor), Clemilton Lopes Parducci Soares de Lima (Tradutor), Mateus |
spellingShingle |
Agud (Autora), Ana Pinheiro (Tradutor), Clemilton Lopes Parducci Soares de Lima (Tradutor), Mateus The need and paradoxes of integral linguistics |
author_facet |
Agud (Autora), Ana Pinheiro (Tradutor), Clemilton Lopes Parducci Soares de Lima (Tradutor), Mateus |
author_sort |
Agud (Autora), Ana |
title |
The need and paradoxes of integral linguistics |
title_short |
The need and paradoxes of integral linguistics |
title_full |
The need and paradoxes of integral linguistics |
title_fullStr |
The need and paradoxes of integral linguistics |
title_full_unstemmed |
The need and paradoxes of integral linguistics |
title_sort |
need and paradoxes of integral linguistics |
description |
Coseriu’s idea of an “integral linguistics” needs a thorough reflection because it embraces two different and partly incompatible aims: to counteract the extreme fragmentation of modern linguistic research through philosophical reflection on the true nature of “language”, and to work out some coherent way of approaching linguistic research which avoids its being torn apart by the diversity of the objects constituted by linguists and linguistic schools. No new positive theory of the whole of language might overcome this disintegration. Coseriu‘s efforts to enlarge the scope to include linguistic facts have to be submitted to a radical skeptical reflection on the possibility of such an overall positive theory, based on the real fact that factual speech is not the mere use of any virtual system, but an ongoing creation of sense by individuals, and also that linguistics is itself such “factual speech”: individual, historical, diffuse. Coseriu did not deliver any general theory of language, but the living example of a rich and widely comprehensive individual personality, approaching language from a critical attitude to inherited categories and methods. |
publisher |
UFRN |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/30550 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT agudautoraana theneedandparadoxesofintegrallinguistics AT pinheirotradutorclemiltonlopes theneedandparadoxesofintegrallinguistics AT parduccisoaresdelimatradutormateus theneedandparadoxesofintegrallinguistics AT agudautoraana anecessidadeeosparadoxosdalinguisticaintegral AT pinheirotradutorclemiltonlopes anecessidadeeosparadoxosdalinguisticaintegral AT parduccisoaresdelimatradutormateus anecessidadeeosparadoxosdalinguisticaintegral AT agudautoraana needandparadoxesofintegrallinguistics AT pinheirotradutorclemiltonlopes needandparadoxesofintegrallinguistics AT parduccisoaresdelimatradutormateus needandparadoxesofintegrallinguistics |
_version_ |
1771850166232416256 |