RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM IN CRIMINAL CONCEPT: LIMITS ON PREVENTIVE PRISON AND PRISON AFTER SECOND INSTANCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
This paper aims to analyze the limits of intervention in individual liberty in view of the application of the legal institutes of pre-trial detention and prison after the second instance. The problem of such legal measures is current, especially in view of the cases of curtailing the freedom of form...
Na minha lista:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online |
Idioma: | por |
Publicado em: |
Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN
|
Endereço do item: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/transgressoes/article/view/18639 |
Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
id |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article-18639 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article-186392021-10-08T12:06:17Z RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM IN CRIMINAL CONCEPT: LIMITS ON PREVENTIVE PRISON AND PRISON AFTER SECOND INSTANCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS RESTRIÇÃO À LIBERDADE NO ÂMBITO CRIMINAL: LIMITES DA PRISÃO PREVENTIVA E DA PRISÃO APÓS SEGUNDA INSTÂNCIA NO PROCESSO PENAL Ferreira Pinto, Fernando Wallace Prisão preventiva Prisão após a segunda instância Limites Pre-trial detetion Imprisonment after the second instance Limits This paper aims to analyze the limits of intervention in individual liberty in view of the application of the legal institutes of pre-trial detention and prison after the second instance. The problem of such legal measures is current, especially in view of the cases of curtailing the freedom of former presidents of the Federative Republic of Brazil: Michel Temer and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. The Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988 engendered prominence in the protection of fundamental rights, with the right of liberty analytically affirmed, assuring everyone the right to liberty and only exceptionally allowing its suppression before the final conviction. In such circumstances, there is an imperative need for a dogmatic approach to the right to liberty and its limits in view of its flexibility by the state, using a hypothetical inductive methodology, with concrete approaches and considerations around such institutes. Este trabalho tem o escopo de analisar os limites de intervenção na liberdade individual em face da aplicação dos institutos jurídicos da prisão preventiva e prisão após segunda instância. A problemática de tais medidas jurídicas é atual, sobretudo tendo em vista os casos de cerceamento da liberdade dos ex-presidentes da República Federativa do Brasil: Michel Temer e Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. A Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988 engendrou relevo na proteção aos direitos fundamentais, com o direito de liberdade positivado de modo analítico, assegurando a todos o direito de liberdade e permitindo, apenas excepcionalmente, sua supressão antes da condenação definitiva. Em tais circunstâncias, surge a imperiosa necessidade de uma abordagem dogmática em torno do direito de liberdade e seus limites diante de sua flexibilização pelo Estado, utilizando-se, para tanto, de uma metodologia hipotético indutiva, com abordagens concretas e considerações em torno de tais institutos. Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN 2020-02-15 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares application/pdf https://periodicos.ufrn.br/transgressoes/article/view/18639 Revista Transgressões; v. 7 n. 02 (2019); 93-118 2318-0277 10.21680/2318-0277.2019v7n02 por https://periodicos.ufrn.br/transgressoes/article/view/18639/12505 Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Transgressões |
institution |
Periódicos UFRN |
collection |
Portal de Pediódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN |
language |
por |
format |
Online |
author |
Ferreira Pinto, Fernando Wallace |
spellingShingle |
Ferreira Pinto, Fernando Wallace RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM IN CRIMINAL CONCEPT: LIMITS ON PREVENTIVE PRISON AND PRISON AFTER SECOND INSTANCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS |
author_facet |
Ferreira Pinto, Fernando Wallace |
author_sort |
Ferreira Pinto, Fernando Wallace |
title |
RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM IN CRIMINAL CONCEPT: LIMITS ON PREVENTIVE PRISON AND PRISON AFTER SECOND INSTANCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS |
title_short |
RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM IN CRIMINAL CONCEPT: LIMITS ON PREVENTIVE PRISON AND PRISON AFTER SECOND INSTANCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS |
title_full |
RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM IN CRIMINAL CONCEPT: LIMITS ON PREVENTIVE PRISON AND PRISON AFTER SECOND INSTANCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS |
title_fullStr |
RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM IN CRIMINAL CONCEPT: LIMITS ON PREVENTIVE PRISON AND PRISON AFTER SECOND INSTANCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS |
title_full_unstemmed |
RESTRICTION OF FREEDOM IN CRIMINAL CONCEPT: LIMITS ON PREVENTIVE PRISON AND PRISON AFTER SECOND INSTANCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS |
title_sort |
restriction of freedom in criminal concept: limits on preventive prison and prison after second instance in criminal proceedings |
description |
This paper aims to analyze the limits of intervention in individual liberty in view of the application of the legal institutes of pre-trial detention and prison after the second instance. The problem of such legal measures is current, especially in view of the cases of curtailing the freedom of former presidents of the Federative Republic of Brazil: Michel Temer and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. The Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988 engendered prominence in the protection of fundamental rights, with the right of liberty analytically affirmed, assuring everyone the right to liberty and only exceptionally allowing its suppression before the final conviction. In such circumstances, there is an imperative need for a dogmatic approach to the right to liberty and its limits in view of its flexibility by the state, using a hypothetical inductive methodology, with concrete approaches and considerations around such institutes. |
publisher |
Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/transgressoes/article/view/18639 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ferreirapintofernandowallace restrictionoffreedomincriminalconceptlimitsonpreventiveprisonandprisonaftersecondinstanceincriminalproceedings AT ferreirapintofernandowallace restricaoaliberdadenoambitocriminallimitesdaprisaopreventivaedaprisaoapossegundainstancianoprocessopenal |
_version_ |
1766683151153758208 |