La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa

On February 12, 1440 Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) concludes in his birthplace of Kues drafting the first major systematic formulation of his thinking: De docta ignorantia. The main category of his metaphysics in this context, i.e. the maximum, is analyzed and interpreted by him on three considerati...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rios, José González
Formato: Online
Idioma:por
Publicado em: EDUFRN
Endereço do item:https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/1714
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
id oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article-1714
record_format ojs
spelling oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article-17142016-12-16T17:03:21Z La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa Rios, José González docta ignorantia coincidentia oppositorum maximum et minimum absolutum discurso teológico nomes inefáveis On February 12, 1440 Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) concludes in his birthplace of Kues drafting the first major systematic formulation of his thinking: De docta ignorantia. The main category of his metaphysics in this context, i.e. the maximum, is analyzed and interpreted by him on three considerations: the maximum in an absolute sense, as contracted and finally as absolute and contracted, at the same time. In the context of the First Book, which presents the singular methodology of the docta ignorantia, considers the maximum in itself in light of the paradoxical concept of coincidentia oppositorum in the absolute. In the final chapters of this first book tackles the critical of the theological discourse and thus, the problem of the ineffable name of maximum et minimum absolutum. Hence the purpose of this work is the further on cusan’s evaluation of language problem as it shows through treatment of the theological discourses and divine names that emerge from them, in light of the way of docta ignorantia. EDUFRN 2012-04-02 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares application/pdf https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/1714 Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 18 n. 30 (2011): Princípios: revista de filosofia; 27-52 1983-2109 0104-8694 por https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/1714/1179 Copyright (c) 2014 Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN)
institution Periódicos UFRN
collection Portal de Pediódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN
language por
format Online
author Rios, José González
spellingShingle Rios, José González
La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
author_facet Rios, José González
author_sort Rios, José González
title La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
title_short La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
title_full La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
title_fullStr La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
title_full_unstemmed La concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de Nicolás de Cusa
title_sort la concepción intelectual de lo divino como coincidentia oppositorum a la luz de lo maximum et minimum absolutum en el pensamiento de nicolás de cusa
description On February 12, 1440 Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) concludes in his birthplace of Kues drafting the first major systematic formulation of his thinking: De docta ignorantia. The main category of his metaphysics in this context, i.e. the maximum, is analyzed and interpreted by him on three considerations: the maximum in an absolute sense, as contracted and finally as absolute and contracted, at the same time. In the context of the First Book, which presents the singular methodology of the docta ignorantia, considers the maximum in itself in light of the paradoxical concept of coincidentia oppositorum in the absolute. In the final chapters of this first book tackles the critical of the theological discourse and thus, the problem of the ineffable name of maximum et minimum absolutum. Hence the purpose of this work is the further on cusan’s evaluation of language problem as it shows through treatment of the theological discourses and divine names that emerge from them, in light of the way of docta ignorantia.
publisher EDUFRN
publishDate 2012
url https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/1714
work_keys_str_mv AT riosjosegonzalez laconcepcionintelectualdelodivinocomocoincidentiaoppositorumalaluzdelomaximumetminimumabsolutumenelpensamientodenicolasdecusa
_version_ 1766681780205649920

Registros relacionados