The narrator in Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1): (im)parciality?

This paper aims to present a reading of the short story Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1) by Alcântara Machado. The narrative is a text of great narrative force, which opens up opportunities for studies of this nature given the radiophonic language mobilized by the narrator to conduct the facts as th...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Principais autores: Santos, James Rios de Oliveira, Angelo, Tiago
Formato: Online
Idioma:por
Publicado em: UFRN
Endereço do item:https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/16264
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
id oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article-16264
record_format ojs
spelling oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article-162642019-06-18T22:18:35Z The narrator in Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1): (im)parciality? O narrador em Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1): (im)parcialidade? Santos, James Rios de Oliveira Angelo, Tiago Literature Soccer (Im)parciality Literatura Futebol (Im)parcialidade This paper aims to present a reading of the short story Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1) by Alcântara Machado. The narrative is a text of great narrative force, which opens up opportunities for studies of this nature given the radiophonic language mobilized by the narrator to conduct the facts as the linguistic-enunciative marks suggest that the narrator supports one of the soccer teams. This qualitative research study proposes a reading to evidence the impartiality of the narrator throughout the game between Corinthians and Palestra. However, during the analysis, we found that the narrator reveals himself to be a Corinthians fan, which makes him a partial fictional instance. In order to attest such partiality, this study mobilizes theoretical and critical studies about the narrative focus, such as the ones by Norman Friedmann (2002), Wayne Booth (1980), and Davi Arrigucci (1998). O presente trabalho objetiva apresentar uma leitura do conto Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1), de Alcântara Machado. Texto de grande vigor narrativo, o conto em apreço abre margem para estudos desta natureza dada à linguagem radiofônica mobilizada pelo narrador para a condução dos fatos, uma vez que as marcas linguístico-enunciativas sugerem a torcida do narrador para um dos times de futebol. Pesquisa de natureza bibliográfica, este artigo faz uso do método qualitativo para propor uma leitura que evidencie a imparcialidade do narrador ante o jogo entre Corinthians e Palestra. No curso da análise realizada, constatou-se que o narrador revela-se corintiano, o que o torna uma instância ficcional parcial. Com intuito de atestar tal parcialidade, este estudo mobiliza estudos teóricos e críticos acerca do foco narrativo, tais como o de Norman Friedmann (2002), Wayne Booth (1980) e Davi Arrigucci (1998). UFRN 2019-04-29 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/16264 Odisseia; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019); p. 75 - 89 Revue Odisseia; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019); p. 75 - 89 Revista Odisseia; v. 4 n. 1 (2019); p. 75 - 89 1983-2435 10.21680/1983-2435.2019v4n1 por https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/16264/11405 Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Odisseia
institution Periódicos UFRN
collection Portal de Pediódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN
language por
format Online
author Santos, James Rios de Oliveira
Angelo, Tiago
spellingShingle Santos, James Rios de Oliveira
Angelo, Tiago
The narrator in Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1): (im)parciality?
author_facet Santos, James Rios de Oliveira
Angelo, Tiago
author_sort Santos, James Rios de Oliveira
title The narrator in Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1): (im)parciality?
title_short The narrator in Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1): (im)parciality?
title_full The narrator in Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1): (im)parciality?
title_fullStr The narrator in Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1): (im)parciality?
title_full_unstemmed The narrator in Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1): (im)parciality?
title_sort narrator in corinthians (2) vs. palestra (1): (im)parciality?
description This paper aims to present a reading of the short story Corinthians (2) VS. Palestra (1) by Alcântara Machado. The narrative is a text of great narrative force, which opens up opportunities for studies of this nature given the radiophonic language mobilized by the narrator to conduct the facts as the linguistic-enunciative marks suggest that the narrator supports one of the soccer teams. This qualitative research study proposes a reading to evidence the impartiality of the narrator throughout the game between Corinthians and Palestra. However, during the analysis, we found that the narrator reveals himself to be a Corinthians fan, which makes him a partial fictional instance. In order to attest such partiality, this study mobilizes theoretical and critical studies about the narrative focus, such as the ones by Norman Friedmann (2002), Wayne Booth (1980), and Davi Arrigucci (1998).
publisher UFRN
publishDate 2019
url https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/16264
work_keys_str_mv AT santosjamesriosdeoliveira thenarratorincorinthians2vspalestra1imparciality
AT angelotiago thenarratorincorinthians2vspalestra1imparciality
AT santosjamesriosdeoliveira onarradoremcorinthians2vspalestra1imparcialidade
AT angelotiago onarradoremcorinthians2vspalestra1imparcialidade
AT santosjamesriosdeoliveira narratorincorinthians2vspalestra1imparciality
AT angelotiago narratorincorinthians2vspalestra1imparciality
_version_ 1766682435561455616

Registros relacionados