Legitimacy in european nature conservation policy case studies in multilevel governance /

This volume focuses on the issue of legitimacy in the context of European nature conservation policy. It provides insights in the way in which democratic legitimacy is being produced at different levels of governance. Building forth upon recent developments in democracy theory that have identified...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:

Detalhes bibliográficos
Principais autores:	Keulartz, Jozef, Leistra, Gilbert, SpringerLink (Online service)
Formato:	Digital
Publicado em:
Assuntos:	Ciências ambientais. Meio ambiente. Conservação da natureza. Biodiversidade - Conservação.
Endereço do item:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6510-1
Tags:	Adicionar Tag Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!

id	oai:localhost:123456789-210738
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:localhost:123456789-2107382023-07-17T15:09:43Z Legitimacy in european nature conservation policy case studies in multilevel governance / Keulartz, Jozef Leistra, Gilbert SpringerLink (Online service) Ciências ambientais. Meio ambiente. Conservação da natureza. Biodiversidade - Conservação. This volume focuses on the issue of legitimacy in the context of European nature conservation policy. It provides insights in the way in which democratic legitimacy is being produced at different levels of governance. Building forth upon recent developments in democracy theory that have identified multiple forms of legitimacy, the volume observes a EU-wide shift from output legitimacy to input and throughput legitimacy. Top down policy making is increasingly meeting local resistance. As a result, the importance for policy makers of enhancing the democratic legitimacy of their policy plans has increased. The popularity of deliberative decision-making procedures can be seen as a procedural answer to this state of affairs. For this volume scholars from within the EU were invited to reflect upon the question whether similar developments are taking place in the context with which they are most familiar. Do they perceive a delegitimation of top down policy making and hence an increasing emphasis on procedural legitimacy in processes of nature conservation policy implementation? Which model of democratic decision-making is most helpful to solve the issue of legitimacy in the field of nature conservation policy? How important are national traditions and institutions? What are the tradeoffs between the different types of legitimacy? Nine case studies are presented: two case studies on protected species (geese in the Netherlands, and the great cormorant in Denmark, France and Italy), four case studies that zoom in on specific protected areas (in Spain, Finland, Poland and the UK), and three case studies with a focus on the implementation of Natura 2000 at the country level (Belgium, France and Germany). These case studies are followed by extensive comments. 0 2022-10-11T17:07:16Z 2022-10-11T17:07:16Z 2008. Digital 502 L514 9781402065101 195594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6510-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6510-1
institution	Acervo SISBI
collection	SIGAA
topic	Ciências ambientais. Meio ambiente. Conservação da natureza. Biodiversidade - Conservação.
spellingShingle	Ciências ambientais. Meio ambiente. Conservação da natureza. Biodiversidade - Conservação. Keulartz, Jozef Leistra, Gilbert SpringerLink (Online service) Legitimacy in european nature conservation policy case studies in multilevel governance /
description	This volume focuses on the issue of legitimacy in the context of European nature conservation policy. It provides insights in the way in which democratic legitimacy is being produced at different levels of governance. Building forth upon recent developments in democracy theory that have identified multiple forms of legitimacy, the volume observes a EU-wide shift from output legitimacy to input and throughput legitimacy. Top down policy making is increasingly meeting local resistance. As a result, the importance for policy makers of enhancing the democratic legitimacy of their policy plans has increased. The popularity of deliberative decision-making procedures can be seen as a procedural answer to this state of affairs. For this volume scholars from within the EU were invited to reflect upon the question whether similar developments are taking place in the context with which they are most familiar. Do they perceive a delegitimation of top down policy making and hence an increasing emphasis on procedural legitimacy in processes of nature conservation policy implementation? Which model of democratic decision-making is most helpful to solve the issue of legitimacy in the field of nature conservation policy? How important are national traditions and institutions? What are the tradeoffs between the different types of legitimacy? Nine case studies are presented: two case studies on protected species (geese in the Netherlands, and the great cormorant in Denmark, France and Italy), four case studies that zoom in on specific protected areas (in Spain, Finland, Poland and the UK), and three case studies with a focus on the implementation of Natura 2000 at the country level (Belgium, France and Germany). These case studies are followed by extensive comments.
format	Digital
author	Keulartz, Jozef Leistra, Gilbert SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet	Keulartz, Jozef Leistra, Gilbert SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort	Keulartz, Jozef
title	Legitimacy in european nature conservation policy case studies in multilevel governance /
title_short	Legitimacy in european nature conservation policy case studies in multilevel governance /
title_full	Legitimacy in european nature conservation policy case studies in multilevel governance /
title_fullStr	Legitimacy in european nature conservation policy case studies in multilevel governance /
title_full_unstemmed	Legitimacy in european nature conservation policy case studies in multilevel governance /
title_sort	legitimacy in european nature conservation policy case studies in multilevel governance /
publishDate	2022
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6510-1
work_keys_str_mv	AT keulartzjozef legitimacyineuropeannatureconservationpolicycasestudiesinmultilevelgovernance AT leistragilbert legitimacyineuropeannatureconservationpolicycasestudiesinmultilevelgovernance AT springerlinkonlineservice legitimacyineuropeannatureconservationpolicycasestudiesinmultilevelgovernance
_version_	1771688068806344704

Legitimacy in european nature conservation policy case studies in multilevel governance /

Registros relacionados